Komplo Teorilerinin Etki Potansiyelini Anlama: Texe Marrs’ın Illuminati Örneği

Ertuğrul Buğra Orhan; Ayşe Ceylan

doi:10.52791/aksarayiibd.1504639

TR EN

Komplo Teorilerinin Etki Potansiyelini Anlama: Texe Marrs’ın Illuminati Örneği

Öz

Komplo teorileri, toplumların belirli kesimlerini doğrulanamayacak bilgiler ile mobilize edebildiği ve manipülatif etki oluşturabildiği için olumsuz etkiler yaratabilmektedir. Dünyayı kontrol eden gizemli örgütler, paranın kontrolü gibi konular ilgi çekici gibi görünse de gerçek dışı kurguların içselleştirilmesine neden olabilir. Bu olumsuz potansiyelin yaratabileceği etkileri öngörmenin zorluğundan dolayı komplo teorisi okuyucularının maruz kaldıkları içeriklerin niteliğini anlamak oldukça önemlidir. Komplo teorisi literatürünün çalışma kapsamı çerçevesinde oldukça geniş boşluklar sunduğu görülmüş, bu alanda yazılan bir kitabın içerik analizinin detaylı biçimde yapılmadığı anlaşılmış ve gözlemlenen boşluğun literatürü genişletme potansiyeli ortaya koyulmuştur. Bu bilgiler ışığında çalışmanın amacı, komplo teorilerinin kitleler üzerinde ne gibi manipülatif etkiler oluşturabileceğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada “Illuminati” ana başlıklı komplo teorilerini ele alan Circle of Intrigue: The Hidden Circle of the Global Illuminati Conspiracy adlı kitabıniçeriğinin kitlelere hangi kavramlar çerçevesinde ve nasıl bir duygusal tonla ulaştığı araştırılmıştır. Kitap içeriği, fenomenolojik azaltma yapılarak temel frekans dağılımı, kelime gruplandırma ve duygu analizi sonuçlarının tartışması yapılarak ele alınmıştır. Analizler Rstudio programı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre içerik, kitleler üzerinde irrasyonalite, güvensizlik, kanıksama, umutsuzluk ve propaganda bağlamlarında manipülatif etkiler oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Understanding the Impact Potential of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of Texe Marrs’ Illuminati

Abstract

Conspiracy theories can have negative effects as they mobilize certain segments of society with unverifiable information and create a manipulative impact. While topics such as secret organizations controlling the world or the dominance of financial power may seem intriguing, they can lead to the internalization of fictitious and unfounded narratives. Given the difficulty of predicting the consequences of this negative potential, it is crucial to understand the nature of the content to which readers of conspiracy theories are exposed. It has been observed that the literature on conspiracy theories presents significant research gaps, and no comprehensive content analysis has been conducted on books in this field. This gap highlights the potential for expanding the existing body of literature. In light of this, the present study aims to examine the manipulative effects that conspiracy theories can have on the masses. Accordingly, the study investigates how the book Circle of Intrigue: The Hidden Circle of the Global Illuminati Conspiracy, which discusses Illuminati-themed conspiracy theories, conveys its content to audiences in terms of conceptual framing and emotional tone. The book's content was analyzed through phenomenological reduction, with discussions based on fundamental frequency distribution, word grouping, and sentiment analysis. The analyses were conducted using the RStudio software. The findings indicate that the content exerts manipulative effects on audiences in terms of irrationality, distrust, normalization, hopelessness, and propaganda.

Keywords

Kaynakça

Aguilar, L. (2023). Memeing a conspiracy theory: On the biopolitical compression of the great replacement conspiracy theories. Ethnography, 25(1), 76-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221146983
Alsaid, M., & Hawamdeh, S. (2023). The impact of social media on covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance: Data analytic approach. Proceedings of the Alise Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2022.1098
Bicheno, H. (1972). Anti‐parliamentary themes in chilean history: 1920–70. Government and Opposition, 7(3), 351-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1972.tb00846.x
Bloomberg HT. (2023, 14 Nisan). BlackRock’ın varlıkları banka krizinin ardından 9 trilyon doları aştı. https://www.bloomberght.com/blackrockin-varliklari-banka-krizinin-ardindan-9-trilyon-dolari-asti-2329891
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
Cíbik, M. & Hardoš, P. (2020). Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119899232 Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Deutsche Welle. (2015, 10 Ağustos). Dünyanın en büyüğü: Blackrock. https://www.dw.com/tr/finans-d%C3%BCnyas%C4%B1n%C4%B1n-gizli-s%C3%BCper-g%C3%BCc%C3%BC/a-18653440
DiGrazia, J. (2017). The social determinants of conspiratorial ideation. Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116689791

Douglas, K. (2021). Are conspiracy theories harmless? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2021.10
Douglas, K. (2021). Covid-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982068
deHaven-Smith, L., & Witt, M. T. (2013). Conspiracy theory reconsidered: Responding to mass suspicions of political criminality in high office. Administration & Society, 45(3), 267-295.
Ford, B., Feinberg, M., Lassetter, B., Thai, S., & Gatchpazian, A. (2023). The political is personal: The costs of daily politics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000335
Frenken, M. (2021). A uniform conspiracy mindset or differentiated reactions to specific conspiracy beliefs? Evidence from latent profile analyses. International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.590
Galluzzo, A. (2019). Brown, the Illuminati, and the public sphere. In P. Barnard, M. L. Kamrath, & S. Shapiro (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Charles Brockden Brown (pp. 335–350). Oxford University Press.
Gargan, E., & Cubitt, G. (1995). The jesuit myth: conspiracy theory and politics in nineteenth-century France. The American Historical Review, 100(4), 1258. https://doi.org/10.2307/2168259
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
Gkinopoulos, T., & Mari, S. (2022). How exposure to real conspiracy theories motivates collective action and political engagement? The moderating role of primed victimhood and underlying emotional mechanisms in the case of 2018 bushfire in attica. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12923
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4). 731-742.
Gül, S. S., & Nizam, Ö. K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde söylem ve içerik analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.803182
Hebel-Sela, S., Stefaniak, A., Vandermeulen, D., Adler, E., Hameiri, B., & Halperin, E. (2023). Are societies in conflict more susceptible to believe in covid-19 conspiracy theories? A 66 nation study. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 29(3), 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000645
Hennesey, J. (1995). Book review: The jesuit myth: Conspiracy theory and politics in nineteenth-century France. Theological Studies, 56(1), 167-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056399505600116
Herrero, M. (2023). Theopolitical figures: Scripture, prophecy, oath, charisma, hospitality. Edinburgh University Press.
Hughes, J., Efstratiou, A., Komer, S., Baxter, L., Vasiljevic, M., & Leite, A. (2022). The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on covid-19 pandemic-related behaviors. Plos One, 17(2), e0263716. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263716
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Imhoff, R. (2024). On the usefulness of the conspiracy mentality concept. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000550
Jolley, D. (2023). The impact of conspiracy beliefs on a targeted group: Perceived popularity of Jewish‐targeted conspiracy beliefs elicits outgroup avoidant behaviors. British Journal of Psychology, 115(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12690
Kızılkaya, E., & Uzman, E. (2023). Genel komplo teorilerine inanma ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.1.654
Krekó, P., Orosz, G., Faragó, L., & Zsila, Á. (2023). The viral warfare: Uncovering the connection between conspiracy theories on COVID and the war in Ukraine [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3359277/v1
Konda Araştırma. (2018). Toplumun komplo teorilerine bakışı araştırması. Yazar. https://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/toplumun-komplo-teorilerine-bakisi/
Küçükaydın, M., Esen, S., & Geçer, S. (2023). Did we trust in science during the covid‐19 pandemic? Modeling the relationship between trust, awareness, and conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(6), 1266-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4120
Leman, P., & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378
Mahl, D., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. (2021). From “nasa lies” to “reptilian eyes”: Mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482
Mahl, D., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. (2023). Platformization of conspiracism: Introducing a theoretical framework for investigating conspiracy theories on “alternative” platforms using a case study of bitchute and gab. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2022i0.13049
Marinov, N., & Popova, M. (2021). Will the real conspiracy please stand up: Sources of post-communist democratic failure. Perspectives on Politics, 20(1), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592721001973
Marrs, T. (1995). Circle of intrigue: The hidden circle of the global Illuminati conspiracy. Living Truth. Marrs, T. (2002). İlluminati: Entrika çemberi. Timaş Yayınları.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Nadzir, I. (2020). Conspiracy theories and modern disjuncture amidst covid-19 in Indonesia. Masyarakat Indonesia, 46(2), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v46i2.909
Nera, K. (2024). Analyzing the causation between conspiracy mentality and belief in conspiracy theories. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000533
Nera, K., Procop, I., & Klein, O. (2023). Comparing the ideological correlates of anti-government and anti-Roma conspiracy beliefs in Romania. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909231162276
Padberg, W. (1995). The jesuit myth: Conspiracy theory and politics in nineteenth-century france by geoffrey cubitt. The Catholic Historical Review, 81(1), 89-90. https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.1995.0133
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1-135.
Petrovic, N. (2020). Tackling the Covid-19 conspiracies: The data-driven approach. In 2020 International Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST) (pp. 27–30). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icest49890.2020.9232760
Prims, J. (2024). Call it a conspiracy: How conspiracy belief predicts recognition of conspiracy theories. Plos One, 19(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301601
Prooijen, J., & Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.006
Prooijen, J., & Douglas, K. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Prooijen, J., & Douglas, K. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530
Robinson, J. (1799). Extracts from Professor Robison’s “Proofs of a conspiracy” etc., with brief reflections on the charges he has exhibited, the evidence he has produced and the merit of his performance. Manning & Loring.
Rosen, L. (2024). Copresent jurisdictions: Spirits, theopolitics, and the rise of akan spirituality in the United States. Polar Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 47(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12568
Schneider, S., & Haas, I. J. (2021). Political threat, ideology, and conspiracy endorsement [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2kb5q
Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 34(1), 1-47.
Siekmann, R. (1998). The fall of srebrenica and the attitude of dutchbat from an international legal perspective. Yearb. Int. Human. Law, 1, 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1389135900000179
Strömbäck, J. (2024). Disentangling the relationship between conspiracy mindset versus beliefs in specific conspiracy theories. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000546
Sutton, R. (2024). Conspiracy mentality versus belief in conspiracy theories. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000549
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2012). Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of amelia earhart. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(4), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.697932
Wang, J., & Kim, S. (2021). The paradox of conspiracy theory: The positive impact of beliefs in conspiracy theories on preventive actions and vaccination intentions during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211825
Waters, A. (1997). Conspiracy theories as ethnosociologies: explanation and intention in African American political culture. Journal of Black Studies, 28(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193479702800107
Wildt, L., & Aupers, S. (2023). Participatory conspiracy culture: Believing, doubting and playing with conspiracy theories on Reddit. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 30(1), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231178914
Yang, Z., Luo, X., & Jia, H. (2021). Is it all a conspiracy? Conspiracy theories and people’s attitude to covid-19 vaccination. Vaccines, 9(10), 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101051
Yüksel, E. (2019, Kasım). Türkiye’de iletişim araştırmalarında içerik analizi uygulamaları, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Bildiri sunumu]. International Euroasia Congress on Scientific Researches and Recent Trends, Hazar Üniversitesi, Bakü, Azerbaycan.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Uluslararası İktisat (Diğer) , Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ertuğrul Buğra Orhan ^*
0000-0003-2455-5441
Türkiye

Ayşe Ceylan
0009-0006-3831-8972
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

26 Haziran 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Haziran 2024

Kabul Tarihi

8 Nisan 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1504639

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA95PJ89BU

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Orhan, E. B., & Ceylan, A. (2025). Komplo Teorilerinin Etki Potansiyelini Anlama: Texe Marrs’ın Illuminati Örneği. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1504639