Araştırma Makalesi

Önemli Bir Dış Yardım Politikası Aracı Olarak Kültürel Diplomasi: Yunus Emre Örneği

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 29 Aralık 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Cultural Diplomacy as an Important Foreign Aid Tools: The Case Study of Yunus Emre Institute

Abstract

While military power and economic sanctions played an important role in interstate relations during the Cold War, the concept of soft power, which consists of cultural, historical and universal values that countries have in the post-Cold War conjuncture, has begun to replace hard powers. In the last quarter of the 20th century, the armament and ideological warfare of the bipolar system began to lose its importance. These two concepts have been replaced by elements such as identity and culture. In this direction, countries have started to use their cultures, languages and values to have an impact on other countries without using hard power. This situation has caused powerful states in the world to reconsider their foreign policies. Turkey has been one of the countries that attaches importance to the concept of soft power and uses it effectively in foreign policy since the beginning of the 2000s. Especially with the 2000s, Turkey has made important changes in its foreign policy to keep up with this new order and has adopted an approach that includes foreign aid and cultural diplomacy in foreign policy. The effective use of cultural diplomacy in foreign policy has broken the prejudices of the receiving countries. In this context, cultural diplomacy has an extremely important role in making foreign aid more effective.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Akçay, Engin. 2012. Bir Dış Politika Enstrümanı Olarak Türk Dış Yardımları. Ankara: Turgut Özal Universitesi.
  2. Bayraktar, Zülfikar. 2012. ‘Türkiye’nin Balkanlardaki Yumuşak Gücü: Türk Kültürü’. Karadeniz Araştırmaları 9(35):181–89.
  3. Brown, Robin. 2016. ‘Alternatives to Soft Power: Influence in French and German External Cultural Action’. in The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power, edited by N. Chitty. Cambridge: Routledge.
  4. Çavuş, Tuba. 2012. ‘DIŞ POLİTİKADA YUMUŞAK GÜÇ KAVRAMI VE TÜRKİYE’NİN YUMUŞAK GÜÇ KULLANIMI’. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2(2):23–37.
  5. Cimbala, Stephen J. 1998. Coercive Military Strategy. United States of America: Texas A&M University Press.20
  6. Erguvan, Esra. 2010. ‘The Instruments of Soft Power within Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post - Cold Era: Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency (TIKA) As Case of Turkey’s Soft Power Application’. Master thesis, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  7. Fraser, Matthew. 2008. ‘American Pop Culture as Soft Power: Movies and Broadcasting’. Pp. 172–91 in Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States, edited by W. Yasushi and D. McConell. United States of America.
  8. Gallarotti, Giulio. 2011. ‘Soft Power: What It Is, Why It’s Important, and The Conditions Fot Its Effective Use’. Journal of Political Power 4(1):25–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Siyaset Bilimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Kasım 2021

Kabul Tarihi

5 Ekim 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yağcı, S. (2022). Cultural Diplomacy as an Important Foreign Aid Tools: The Case Study of Yunus Emre Institute. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(4), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1021431