Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Analysis of Postgraduate Doctoral Theses Related to the Concept of Entrepreneur

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 77 - 86, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1451704

Öz

The main question of the research is "What are the doctoral level postgraduate theses prepared outside the field of social sciences that contain the title of entrepreneur?". The aim of the research is to analyze the postgraduate doctoral theses prepared in Turkey on the concept of entrepreneur according to the main fields outside the field of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences. It also aims to contribute to the research of researchers who want to study in the field of entrepreneurship. In the research, document analysis method, one of the qualitative research methods, and descriptive content analysis technique was used to analyze the data. Doctoral dissertations in Turkey with the keyword "entrepreneur" were accessed by using the database from the website of the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education. 17 postgraduate doctoral dissertations were identified. Considering that the first postgraduate doctoral thesis in Turkey was published in 1991; it is noteworthy that the first thesis prepared outside the field of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences started in 2002. It was determined that the topics addressed in the theses examined were entrepreneurship, intrapreneurship, entrepreneurship knowledge, entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial intention and types of entrepreneurship, and that the studies mainly focused on students as the population.

Kaynakça

  • Alemany L, & Andreoli JJ. (2018). entrepreneurial finance: the art and science of growing ventures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Aligica PD. (2018). Public entrepreneurship, citizenship, and self-governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Andonova, L. B. (2017). Governance entrepreneurs: international organizations and the rise of global public-private partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bosse, D.A., Harrison, J. S., & Pollack, J.M. (2023). Entrepreneurial opportunities as responsibility. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1177/10422587211069374
  • Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40.
  • Cha, M. S. (2016). A model of academic community entrepreneurship (ACE): Initiation, innovation, and impacts of PICMET, Engineering and Technology Management Faculty Publications and Presentations. 103, 1328-1338. http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/19735
  • Fain, N., & Vukašinović, N. (2020). Entrepreneurial mindset development in business and engineering education – An experiment, International Design Conference – Design 2020, (1)1707-1714. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.71
  • Faley, T. L. (2014). The entrepreneurial arch: a strategic framework for discovering, developing and renewing firms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hatem Afi, H., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2022). Do foreign investment and economic freedom matter for behavioral entrepreneurship? Comparing opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 181, 1-14.
  • Khatami, F., Scuotto, V., Krueger, N., & Cantino, V. (2022). The influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model on sustainable innovation from a macro‑level lens, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 1419–1451
  • Kıral, B. (2020). Nitel bir veri analizi yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Social Sciences Institute SUSBID, (15): 170- 189.
  • Morabito, V. (2022). Digital entrepreneurship: management, systems and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD (2019). The missing entrepreneurs, policies for inclusive entrepreneurship, https://doi.org/10.1787/3ed84801-en.
  • Ozkazanc-Pan B, & Clark Muntean S. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A gender perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parker, S. C. (2018). The economics of entrepreneurship (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T., Wolfe, M., & Patzelt, H. (2016). Learning from entrepreneurial failure: emotions, cognitions, and actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swamidass, P. (2016). Engineering entrepreneurship from idea to business plan: a guide for innovative engineers and scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ÜAK (2023). Doçentlik kriterleri. https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2023/2023-ekim-donemi/2023E_BilimAlanlariAnahtarKelimeler_16102023.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • ÜAK 1 (2023). Doçentlik başvuru şartları. https://www.uak.gov.tr/Sayfalar/docentlik/basvuru-sartlari/2023/2023-ekim-donemi-docentlik-basvuru-sartlari.aspx). adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Whittington, D. (2018). Digital innovation and entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yangyang Yu, Y., Qin, Y., Xu, Z. ve Škare, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of strategic entrepreneurship literatüre, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18: 1475–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00804-7
  • YÖKTEZ (2023). Doktora tezleri. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp adresinden edinilmiştir.

Girişimci Kavramı ile İlişkili Lisansüstü Doktora Tezlerinin Analizi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 77 - 86, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1451704

Öz

Araştırmanın temel sorusu “Girişimci başlığı içeren ve sosyal bilimler alanı dışında hazırlanan doktora düzeyindeki lisansüstü tezler nelerdir?” olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın amacı, girişimci kavramı üzerine Türkiye’de hazırlanan lisansüstü doktora tezlerinin Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler alanı dışında kalan temel alanlara göre analiz edilmesidir. Girişimcilik alanında çalışma yapmak isteyen araştırmacıların araştırmalarına katkı sağlamayı da amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden doküman incelemesi yöntemi ve veriler analizinde betimsel içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Türkiye’de “girişimci” anahtar kelimesi ile yapılmış olan doktora tezlerine Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi internet sitesinden veri tabanı kullanılarak erişilmiştir. 17 lisansüstü doktora tezi tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye’de hazırlanan ilk lisansüstü doktora tezinin 1991 yılında yayınlandığı göz önüne alındığında; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler alanı dışında hazırlanan ilk tezin 2002 yılında başlıyor olması dikkat çekicidir. İncelenen tezlerde ele alınan konuların; girişimcilik, iç girişimcilik, girişimcilik bilgisi, girişimcilik eğitimi, girişimcilik niyeti ve girişimcilik türleri konularına yoğunlaştığı ve ağırlıklı olarak öğrencilerin evren olarak ele alındığı çalışmaların yapıldığı belirlenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Alemany L, & Andreoli JJ. (2018). entrepreneurial finance: the art and science of growing ventures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Aligica PD. (2018). Public entrepreneurship, citizenship, and self-governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Andonova, L. B. (2017). Governance entrepreneurs: international organizations and the rise of global public-private partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bosse, D.A., Harrison, J. S., & Pollack, J.M. (2023). Entrepreneurial opportunities as responsibility. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1177/10422587211069374
  • Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40.
  • Cha, M. S. (2016). A model of academic community entrepreneurship (ACE): Initiation, innovation, and impacts of PICMET, Engineering and Technology Management Faculty Publications and Presentations. 103, 1328-1338. http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/19735
  • Fain, N., & Vukašinović, N. (2020). Entrepreneurial mindset development in business and engineering education – An experiment, International Design Conference – Design 2020, (1)1707-1714. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.71
  • Faley, T. L. (2014). The entrepreneurial arch: a strategic framework for discovering, developing and renewing firms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hatem Afi, H., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2022). Do foreign investment and economic freedom matter for behavioral entrepreneurship? Comparing opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 181, 1-14.
  • Khatami, F., Scuotto, V., Krueger, N., & Cantino, V. (2022). The influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model on sustainable innovation from a macro‑level lens, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 1419–1451
  • Kıral, B. (2020). Nitel bir veri analizi yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Social Sciences Institute SUSBID, (15): 170- 189.
  • Morabito, V. (2022). Digital entrepreneurship: management, systems and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD (2019). The missing entrepreneurs, policies for inclusive entrepreneurship, https://doi.org/10.1787/3ed84801-en.
  • Ozkazanc-Pan B, & Clark Muntean S. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A gender perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parker, S. C. (2018). The economics of entrepreneurship (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T., Wolfe, M., & Patzelt, H. (2016). Learning from entrepreneurial failure: emotions, cognitions, and actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swamidass, P. (2016). Engineering entrepreneurship from idea to business plan: a guide for innovative engineers and scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ÜAK (2023). Doçentlik kriterleri. https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2023/2023-ekim-donemi/2023E_BilimAlanlariAnahtarKelimeler_16102023.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • ÜAK 1 (2023). Doçentlik başvuru şartları. https://www.uak.gov.tr/Sayfalar/docentlik/basvuru-sartlari/2023/2023-ekim-donemi-docentlik-basvuru-sartlari.aspx). adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Whittington, D. (2018). Digital innovation and entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yangyang Yu, Y., Qin, Y., Xu, Z. ve Škare, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of strategic entrepreneurship literatüre, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18: 1475–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00804-7
  • YÖKTEZ (2023). Doktora tezleri. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp adresinden edinilmiştir.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

H. Ufuk Korkmaz 0000-0001-8158-8130

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Mart 2024
Kabul Tarihi 24 Haziran 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Korkmaz, H. U. (2024). Girişimci Kavramı ile İlişkili Lisansüstü Doktora Tezlerinin Analizi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1451704