EN
TR
Comparing Forecasting Powers Of Traditional Methods And Learning Based Methods In Cryptocurrency Market: An Application On Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin And Monero
Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to compare quantitative forecasting methods (traditional and learning based) in cryptocurrency market. For his purpose the daily prices between 16 September 2017 – 15 September 2022 of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin and Monero were analyzed with five different methods: ARIMA, exponential smoothing, artificial neural networks, RNN and LSTM.
In the results it is indicated that exponential smoothing method is the most successful method at forecasting daily prices. The method has high performance in forecasting BTC, ETH and BNB daily prices. But at forecasting daily XMR prices, artificial neural networks method was the most successful one.
The other point which was detected in this study is deep learning based methods made some unsuccessful forecasts. This is thought to be due to the fact that deep learning methods require more data. In future studies, using other quantitative methods (e.g. GRU, XGBoost, transformer models) on other cryptocurrencies will contribute to the literature.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Akaytay, A. (2010). Bağımsız denetimin etkinliğini arttırma aracı olarak yapay sinir ağları: Analitik bir inceleme, Sakarya University Institute of Social Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, Sakarya.
- Al Guindy, M. (2021). Cryptocurrency price volatility and investor attention. International Review of Economics & Finance, 76, 556-570.
- Alamsyah, A., Kusuma, G. N. W., & Ramadhani, D. P. (2024). A review on decentralized finance ecosystems. Future Internet, 16(3), 76.
- Alessandretti, L., ElBahrawy, A., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2018). Machine learning the cryptocurrency market. Complexity, 2018, 1-16.
- Almeida, J., Tata, S., Moser, A. & Smit, V. (2015). Bitcoin prediction using ANN. Neural Networks, 7, 1-12.
- Atsalakis, G. S., Atsalaki, I. G., Pasiouras, F., & Zopounidis, C. (2019). Bitcoin price forecasting with neuro-fuzzy techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 770-780.
- Bariviera, A. F. (2017). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach. Economics Letters, 161, 1-4.
- Barnes, P. (2018). Cryptocurrency and its susceptibility to speculative bubbles, manipulation, scams and fraud. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance (JASF), 9(2 (18)), 60-77.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
26 Mart 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
23 Ağustos 2025
Kabul Tarihi
17 Şubat 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1
APA
Tekin, T. G., & Patır, S. (2026). Comparing Forecasting Powers Of Traditional Methods And Learning Based Methods In Cryptocurrency Market: An Application On Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin And Monero. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1770977