BibTex RIS Cite

SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE

Year 2009, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 133 - 163, 31.07.2009

M. Okan Taşar Savaş Çevik

Abstract

II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında devletin konut piyasasına müdahaleleri önemli hale gelmeye başlamıştır. Bununla birlikte özellikle 1980 ve 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren devletin kullandığı müdahale araç ve biçimlerde önemli bir değişim yaşanmaktadır. Refah devletleri konut politikalarında piyasa ilkelerini geliştirici düzenlemeler yapmaya başlamıştır. Çalışma genel olarak konut piyasasında devletin rolü ve Avrupa ülkelerindeki gelişimi ve Türkiye’nin durumunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunun için öncelikle konut piyasasına devlet müdahalesinin gerekçeleri ve araçları tartışılmakta, arkasından Avrupa ülkelerinde devlet müdahalesinin gelişimi değerlendirilmektedir. Son olarak Türkiye’de devletin konut sektöründeki rolü ve konut politikaları incelenmektedir.

Keywords

Sosyal Konut Kamu Konutu Konut Politikası Konut Sektörü Devletin Rolü

References

  • ALKIŞER, Y. ve H. YÜREKLİ (2004). Türkiye‟de „Devlet Konutu‟nun Dünü, Bugünü, Yarını, İTÜ-B Dergisi. 3(1). Mart, (s:63–74).
  • ANDERSSON, A. E., L. PETTERSON ve U. STROMQUIST (2007). “European Housing Markets – An Overview”. European Metropolitan Housing Markets. A.E. Andersson, Lars Petterson ve U. Strömquist (eds.) New York: Springer. (s:1–26).
  • AYDIN, S. (2003). Türkiye‟de Konut Sorununun Ekonomik Boyutları. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara.
  • BERBEROĞLU M. G. ve S. TEKER (2005). Konut Finansmanı ve Türkiye‟ye Uygun Bir Model Önerisi, İTÜ-B Dergisi. 2(1), (s: 58–68).
  • BIRGERSSON, B. O. ve B. TURNER (2006). “The Future of Mainstream Public Housing in Europe – A Swedish Perspective”. ENHR (European Network for Housing Research) International Conference on Housing in An Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation, and Implementation. Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2–5 Temmuz. [http://enhr2006-ljubljana.uirs.si/]. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2008
  • DANIELS, R. J. ve M. J. TREBILCOCK (2005). Rethinking the Welfare State. London ve New York: Routledge.
  • DAVIDSON, A. (1999). Alternativfe Models of Social Housing: Tenure Patterns and Cost-Renting in New Zeland and Sweden. Housing Studies, 14 (4), (s: 453–472).
  • DİE (2006). İnşaat İstatistikleri. [www.die.gov.tr]
  • DODSON, J. (2006). The “Roll” of the State: Government, Neoliberalism Housing Assistance in Four Advanced Economies. Housing, Theory and Society. 23(4). (s: 224–243).
  • DPT (2001). Konut Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Ankara: DPT
  • GIBB, K (2002). Trends and Change in Social Housing Finance and Provision within the European Union, Housing Studies. 17(2). (s: 325–336).
  • Italian Housing Federation (2006). Housing Statistics in the European Union 2005/2006. Rome: Ministry of Infrastructure of the Italian Republic.
  • KING, P. (1998). Housing: Individuals and The State: The Morality of Government Intervention. London and New York: Routledge
  • KING, P. (2001). Understanding Housing Finance. Florence: Routledge
  • KING, P. (2006). Choice and the End of Social Housing. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs
  • MACLENNAN, D. ve A. MORE (1997). The Future of Social Housing: Key Economic Questions, Housing Studies. 12(4). Ekim, (s: 531–547)
  • NIEBOER, N. ve V. GRUIS (2006). “Government Regulation versus Market Orientation in Social Hosuing Management”. ENHR (European Network for Housing Research) International Conference on Housing in An Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation, and Implementation. Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2–5 Temmuz. [http://enhr2006-ljubljana.uirs.si/]. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2008
  • PRIEMUS, H. ve BOELHOUWER, P. (1999). Social Housing Finance in Europe: Trends and Opprtunities, Urban Studies, 36(4). (s: 633–645).
  • PRIEMUS, H. ve DIELEMAN, F. (1999). Social Housing Finance in the European Union: Developments and Prospects, Urban Studie, 36(4). (s: 623–631).
  • ROSEN, H. (1985). Housing Subsidies: Effects on Housing Deciisions, Efficiency, and Equity. Hanbook of Public Economics Volume – 1. A.J. Auerbach ve M. Feldstein (eds.). (s: 375–420).
  • SCANLON, K. ve C. WHITEHEAD (2007). Socail Housing in Europe, Social Housing in Europe. C. Whitehead ve K. Scanlon (eds.). London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences. (s: 8–33). TOKİ,(2008). Konut Kredileri 1984–2006. [http://www.toki.gov.tr/page.asp?id=22]. Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2008
  • TOMANN, H. (1994). Government Intervention and Regulation: Effects on Housing Finance, Housing Finance International, June, (s: 16–21).
  • UNECE (2005). Housing Finance Systems for Countries in Transition: Principles and Examples, Geneva: United Nations
  • UNECE (2006). Guidelines on Social Housing: Principles and Examples, Geneva: United Nations UNİTED NATIONS (1999). Human Settlements Statistics. [http://unstats.un.org]. Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2008
  • WHITEHEAD, C. M. E. (2003). Financing Social Housing in Europe, Housing Finance International, Haziran. 17 (4), (s: 3–8).
  • WHİTEHEAD, C. M. E. (2006). The Economics of Social Housing, Housing Economics and Public Policy. T. O‟sullivan ve K. Gibb (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Science, (s: 135–152).
  • WOOD, G. A. (1992). The Tax Treatment of Housing: Economic Issues and Reform Measures, Housing Finance International, Haziran, (s: 38–55).

Year 2009, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 133 - 163, 31.07.2009

M. Okan Taşar Savaş Çevik

Abstract

Governments became much more active in the housing area after World War II. Nevertheless, as from 1980s and 1990s, it has been an important changing in the rationale for and mechanisms by which government involvement on housing. Welfare state in various countries have introduced or reinforced market priciples in their housing systems. This paper aims to explain the role and intervention of government in housing sector, the development of housing policies in European countries, and Turkey’s position on this matter. For this reason, the paper firstly discusses government intervention on housing sector and government’s means for intervention, and later, examines developing of government intervention in European countries. Lastly, it inquires housing policies and government’s role on housing sector in Turkey.

Keywords

Social Housing Public Housing Housing Policy Housing Sector Role Of The Government

References

  • ALKIŞER, Y. ve H. YÜREKLİ (2004). Türkiye‟de „Devlet Konutu‟nun Dünü, Bugünü, Yarını, İTÜ-B Dergisi. 3(1). Mart, (s:63–74).
  • ANDERSSON, A. E., L. PETTERSON ve U. STROMQUIST (2007). “European Housing Markets – An Overview”. European Metropolitan Housing Markets. A.E. Andersson, Lars Petterson ve U. Strömquist (eds.) New York: Springer. (s:1–26).
  • AYDIN, S. (2003). Türkiye‟de Konut Sorununun Ekonomik Boyutları. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara.
  • BERBEROĞLU M. G. ve S. TEKER (2005). Konut Finansmanı ve Türkiye‟ye Uygun Bir Model Önerisi, İTÜ-B Dergisi. 2(1), (s: 58–68).
  • BIRGERSSON, B. O. ve B. TURNER (2006). “The Future of Mainstream Public Housing in Europe – A Swedish Perspective”. ENHR (European Network for Housing Research) International Conference on Housing in An Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation, and Implementation. Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2–5 Temmuz. [http://enhr2006-ljubljana.uirs.si/]. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2008
  • DANIELS, R. J. ve M. J. TREBILCOCK (2005). Rethinking the Welfare State. London ve New York: Routledge.
  • DAVIDSON, A. (1999). Alternativfe Models of Social Housing: Tenure Patterns and Cost-Renting in New Zeland and Sweden. Housing Studies, 14 (4), (s: 453–472).
  • DİE (2006). İnşaat İstatistikleri. [www.die.gov.tr]
  • DODSON, J. (2006). The “Roll” of the State: Government, Neoliberalism Housing Assistance in Four Advanced Economies. Housing, Theory and Society. 23(4). (s: 224–243).
  • DPT (2001). Konut Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Ankara: DPT
  • GIBB, K (2002). Trends and Change in Social Housing Finance and Provision within the European Union, Housing Studies. 17(2). (s: 325–336).
  • Italian Housing Federation (2006). Housing Statistics in the European Union 2005/2006. Rome: Ministry of Infrastructure of the Italian Republic.
  • KING, P. (1998). Housing: Individuals and The State: The Morality of Government Intervention. London and New York: Routledge
  • KING, P. (2001). Understanding Housing Finance. Florence: Routledge
  • KING, P. (2006). Choice and the End of Social Housing. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs
  • MACLENNAN, D. ve A. MORE (1997). The Future of Social Housing: Key Economic Questions, Housing Studies. 12(4). Ekim, (s: 531–547)
  • NIEBOER, N. ve V. GRUIS (2006). “Government Regulation versus Market Orientation in Social Hosuing Management”. ENHR (European Network for Housing Research) International Conference on Housing in An Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Participation, and Implementation. Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2–5 Temmuz. [http://enhr2006-ljubljana.uirs.si/]. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2008
  • PRIEMUS, H. ve BOELHOUWER, P. (1999). Social Housing Finance in Europe: Trends and Opprtunities, Urban Studies, 36(4). (s: 633–645).
  • PRIEMUS, H. ve DIELEMAN, F. (1999). Social Housing Finance in the European Union: Developments and Prospects, Urban Studie, 36(4). (s: 623–631).
  • ROSEN, H. (1985). Housing Subsidies: Effects on Housing Deciisions, Efficiency, and Equity. Hanbook of Public Economics Volume – 1. A.J. Auerbach ve M. Feldstein (eds.). (s: 375–420).
  • SCANLON, K. ve C. WHITEHEAD (2007). Socail Housing in Europe, Social Housing in Europe. C. Whitehead ve K. Scanlon (eds.). London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences. (s: 8–33). TOKİ,(2008). Konut Kredileri 1984–2006. [http://www.toki.gov.tr/page.asp?id=22]. Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2008
  • TOMANN, H. (1994). Government Intervention and Regulation: Effects on Housing Finance, Housing Finance International, June, (s: 16–21).
  • UNECE (2005). Housing Finance Systems for Countries in Transition: Principles and Examples, Geneva: United Nations
  • UNECE (2006). Guidelines on Social Housing: Principles and Examples, Geneva: United Nations UNİTED NATIONS (1999). Human Settlements Statistics. [http://unstats.un.org]. Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2008
  • WHITEHEAD, C. M. E. (2003). Financing Social Housing in Europe, Housing Finance International, Haziran. 17 (4), (s: 3–8).
  • WHİTEHEAD, C. M. E. (2006). The Economics of Social Housing, Housing Economics and Public Policy. T. O‟sullivan ve K. Gibb (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Science, (s: 135–152).
  • WOOD, G. A. (1992). The Tax Treatment of Housing: Economic Issues and Reform Measures, Housing Finance International, Haziran, (s: 38–55).
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA44BY52UZ
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

M. Okan Taşar

Savaş Çevik

Publication Date July 31, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009Volume: 1 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Taşar, M. O., & Çevik, S. (2009). SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 133-163.
AMA Taşar MO, Çevik S. SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE. Journal of ASU FEAS. July 2009;1(2):133-163.
Chicago Taşar, M. Okan, and Savaş Çevik. “SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE”. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1, no. 2 (July 2009): 133-63.
EndNote Taşar MO, Çevik S (July 1, 2009) SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1 2 133–163.
IEEE M. O. Taşar and S. Çevik, “SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE”, Journal of ASU FEAS, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 133–163, 2009.
ISNAD Taşar, M. Okan - Çevik, Savaş. “SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE”. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1/2 (July 2009), 133-163.
JAMA Taşar MO, Çevik S. SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE. Journal of ASU FEAS. 2009;1:133–163.
MLA Taşar, M. Okan and Savaş Çevik. “SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE”. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 2, 2009, pp. 133-6.
Vancouver Taşar MO, Çevik S. SOSYAL KONUT VE KONUT SEKTÖRÜNE DEVLET MÜDAHALESİ: AVRUPA ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE. Journal of ASU FEAS. 2009;1(2):133-6.
 Download Cover Image