Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 291 - 305, 30.12.2019

İbrahim Bouzidani Alev Torun

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adams, J. W., Srivastava, A., Herriot, P. & Patterson, F. (2012). Careerist Orientation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Expatriates and Non-Expatriates. Journal of Career Development, 40(6), 469-489.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
  • Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.
  • Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bolino, M. C., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). The Antecedents and Consequences of Underemployment among Expatriates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 889– 911.
  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & DeMuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30–47.
  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2014). Personality Characteristics and the Decision to Become and Stay Self-Employed. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 787- 814.
  • Chan, R. H. K. (2012). Competence, Trust, Job-related Risks and Their Management: The Case of Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 267-283.
  • Chay, Y. W., & Aryee, S. (1999). Potential Moderating Influence of Career Growth Opportunities on Careerist Orientation and Work Attitudes: Evidence of the Protean Career Era in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 613- 623.
  • Cockroft, K. B. (2011). The Relationship between Underemployment and Job Attitudes of New Zealand Graduates. (Thesis, Master of Applied Psychology). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5337.
  • Crawshaw, J. R., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). Justice and Trust as Antecedents of Careerist Orientation. Personnel Review, 40, 106-125.
  • Dinesen, P. T., Nørgaard, A. S., & Klemmensen, R. (2014). The Civic Personality: Personality and Democratic Citizenship. Political Studies, 62, 134-152.
  • Feist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.
  • Feldman, D. C. (1996). The Nature, Antecedents and Consequences of Underemployment. Journal of Management, 22(3), 385– 407.
  • Feldman, D. C., & Weitz, B. A. (1991). From the Invisible Hand to the Glad-hand: Understanding a Careerist Orientation to Work. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 237-257.
  • Feldman, D. C., Leana, C. R., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Underemployment and Relative Deprivation among Re-employed Executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 453-471.
  • Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11, 611–629.
  • Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality Traits and the Propensity to Trust Friends and Strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467-476.
  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A., & DiRenzo, M. (2008). A Boundaryless Perspective on Careers. In J. Barling (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior: 277-299. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hiraishi, K., Yamagata, S., Shikishima, C., & Ando, J. (2008). Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Personality through Control of Mental Mechanisms: A Test of Trust, Extraversion, and Agreeableness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 79–85.
  • Lin, B., Law, K., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why Is Underemployment Related to Creativity and OCB? A Task Crafting Explanation of the Curvilinear Moderated Relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 156-177.
  • Loewenthal, K. M. (2001). An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales (2nd ed). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press Limited.
  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. New York: John Wiley.
  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The Nature and Nurture of Creative Talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495 [University of California, Berkeley, CA].
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
  • Mondak, J., & Halperin, K. (2008). A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–362.
  • Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
  • Oskarsson, S., Dawes, C., Johannesson, M., & Magnusson, P. (2012). The Genetic Origins of the Relationship between Psychological Trust and Social Trust. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15, 21–33.
  • Robert, C., & Wasti, S. A. (2002). Organizational Individualism and Collectivism: Theoretical Development and an Empirical Test of a Measure. Journal of Management, 28(4), 544-566.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New Hire Perceptions of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389- 400.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contract Inventory, Technical Report #3. Pittsburgh, PA: Heinz School of Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration. Journal of Management, 35, 1542–1571.
  • Tan, H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Towards the Differentiation of Trust in Supervisor and Trust in Organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241-260.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weinschenk, A. C., & Dawes, C. T. (2019). The Genetic and Psychological Underpinnings of Generalized Social Trust. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 47-65.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening Employee Creativity: The Role of Leader Emotional Intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 545-568.

THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 291 - 305, 30.12.2019

İbrahim Bouzidani Alev Torun

Öz

Purpose- The present study aimed to explore the contributions of underemployment and careerism to organizational trust and creativity; and to examine the moderating effects of agreeableness, openness to experience, and organizational collectivism on these relationships.
Methodology- The study was conducted in the province of Istanbul/Turkey, among a convenient sample of 156 participants from private organizations. For testing the hypotheses of the present study, simple regression and multiple regression analyses were utilized.
Findings- All underemployment and careerism dimensions were interrelated. Besides, the two dimensions of underemployment were found to be significantly related to the two dimensions of creativity. Also, underemployment and organizational trust, on the one hand, and careerism and creativity, on the other hand, displayed significant relationships. The moderating role was only found for agreeableness on the relationship between behavioral careerism and trust in supervisors.
Conclusion- The impacts of underemployment and careerism on creativity and organizational trust need to be explored further. In addition to that, the moderating roles of other personality traits on these relationships need to be looked at as well.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Underemployment careerism organizational trust creativity moderators

Kaynakça

  • Adams, J. W., Srivastava, A., Herriot, P. & Patterson, F. (2012). Careerist Orientation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Expatriates and Non-Expatriates. Journal of Career Development, 40(6), 469-489.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
  • Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.
  • Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bolino, M. C., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). The Antecedents and Consequences of Underemployment among Expatriates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 889– 911.
  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & DeMuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30–47.
  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2014). Personality Characteristics and the Decision to Become and Stay Self-Employed. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 787- 814.
  • Chan, R. H. K. (2012). Competence, Trust, Job-related Risks and Their Management: The Case of Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 267-283.
  • Chay, Y. W., & Aryee, S. (1999). Potential Moderating Influence of Career Growth Opportunities on Careerist Orientation and Work Attitudes: Evidence of the Protean Career Era in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 613- 623.
  • Cockroft, K. B. (2011). The Relationship between Underemployment and Job Attitudes of New Zealand Graduates. (Thesis, Master of Applied Psychology). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5337.
  • Crawshaw, J. R., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). Justice and Trust as Antecedents of Careerist Orientation. Personnel Review, 40, 106-125.
  • Dinesen, P. T., Nørgaard, A. S., & Klemmensen, R. (2014). The Civic Personality: Personality and Democratic Citizenship. Political Studies, 62, 134-152.
  • Feist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.
  • Feldman, D. C. (1996). The Nature, Antecedents and Consequences of Underemployment. Journal of Management, 22(3), 385– 407.
  • Feldman, D. C., & Weitz, B. A. (1991). From the Invisible Hand to the Glad-hand: Understanding a Careerist Orientation to Work. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 237-257.
  • Feldman, D. C., Leana, C. R., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Underemployment and Relative Deprivation among Re-employed Executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 453-471.
  • Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11, 611–629.
  • Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality Traits and the Propensity to Trust Friends and Strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467-476.
  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A., & DiRenzo, M. (2008). A Boundaryless Perspective on Careers. In J. Barling (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior: 277-299. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hiraishi, K., Yamagata, S., Shikishima, C., & Ando, J. (2008). Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Personality through Control of Mental Mechanisms: A Test of Trust, Extraversion, and Agreeableness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 79–85.
  • Lin, B., Law, K., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why Is Underemployment Related to Creativity and OCB? A Task Crafting Explanation of the Curvilinear Moderated Relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 156-177.
  • Loewenthal, K. M. (2001). An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales (2nd ed). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press Limited.
  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. New York: John Wiley.
  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The Nature and Nurture of Creative Talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495 [University of California, Berkeley, CA].
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
  • Mondak, J., & Halperin, K. (2008). A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–362.
  • Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
  • Oskarsson, S., Dawes, C., Johannesson, M., & Magnusson, P. (2012). The Genetic Origins of the Relationship between Psychological Trust and Social Trust. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15, 21–33.
  • Robert, C., & Wasti, S. A. (2002). Organizational Individualism and Collectivism: Theoretical Development and an Empirical Test of a Measure. Journal of Management, 28(4), 544-566.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New Hire Perceptions of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389- 400.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contract Inventory, Technical Report #3. Pittsburgh, PA: Heinz School of Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration. Journal of Management, 35, 1542–1571.
  • Tan, H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Towards the Differentiation of Trust in Supervisor and Trust in Organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241-260.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weinschenk, A. C., & Dawes, C. T. (2019). The Genetic and Psychological Underpinnings of Generalized Social Trust. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 47-65.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening Employee Creativity: The Role of Leader Emotional Intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 545-568.
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

İbrahim Bouzidani 0000-0003-3585-9352

Alev Torun 0000-0002-4205-4176

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Bouzidani, İ., & Torun, A. (2019). THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM. Research Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 291-305.
AMA Bouzidani İ, Torun A. THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM. RJBM. Aralık 2019;6(4):291-305.
Chicago Bouzidani, İbrahim, ve Alev Torun. “THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM”. Research Journal of Business and Management 6, sy. 4 (Aralık 2019): 291-305.
EndNote Bouzidani İ, Torun A (01 Aralık 2019) THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM. Research Journal of Business and Management 6 4 291–305.
IEEE İ. Bouzidani ve A. Torun, “THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM”, RJBM, c. 6, sy. 4, ss. 291–305, 2019.
ISNAD Bouzidani, İbrahim - Torun, Alev. “THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM”. Research Journal of Business and Management 6/4 (Aralık 2019), 291-305.
JAMA Bouzidani İ, Torun A. THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM. RJBM. 2019;6:291–305.
MLA Bouzidani, İbrahim ve Alev Torun. “THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 6, sy. 4, 2019, ss. 291-05.
Vancouver Bouzidani İ, Torun A. THE IMPACTS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT AND CAREERISM ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND CREATIVITY: THE MODERATING ROLES OF PERSONALITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COLLECTIVISM. RJBM. 2019;6(4):291-305.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.