ANALYSING THE PERFORMANCES OF ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OPERATING IN TURKEY BY USING MULTIMOORA METHOD
Öz
Purpose- In
this study, performance improvement of the asset management companies operating
in Turkey between 2012 and 2016 is aimed.
Methodology- By
analysing the rates calculated with a multi criteria decision making technique,
Multimoora, the change in the sectoral performance during 2012,2013,2014,2015
and 2016 is examined.
Findings- As a result of the analysis, it is observed that the sector of
asset management companies obtained the highest performance result in 2012,
while 2016 has the lowest.
Conclusion- In the
years examined, it is clearly seen that the performance level has gone back
regularly. No relations have been observed between purchasing rates and
performance results of the asset management companies.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Asset management companies performance multi criteria decision-making techniques MULTIMOORA
Kaynakça
- Babuşcu, Ş., Hazar, A. (2013). Varlık yönetim şirketlerine satilacak takipteki krediler için değerleme: varsayimsal bir yaklaşım. World of Accounting Science , 153-175.
- Bekar, M. (2014, Kasım). 2008-2013 döneminde Türk bankacilik sektörünün etkinliğinin VZA, Malmquist TFP endeksi ve Multimoora yöntemi ile incelenmesi. 44. Ankara.
- Çelebi, B. (2014, Haziran). Proje tipi bir işletmede 2-tuple Multimoora yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi. Proje Tipi Bir İşletmede 2-Tuple Multimoora Yöntemi ile Tedarikçi Seçimi . Ankara.
- Fung, B., George, J., Hohl, S., Ma, G. (2004). Public asset management companies in East Asia . Bank of International Settlement.
- Hagiwara, A. T., Passadilla, G. (2004). Experience of Asian asset management companies: do they increase moral hazard?- Evidence from Thailand. ERD Working Paper.
- Inogucci, M. (2012). Nonperforming loans and public asset management companies in Malaysia and Thailand. Asia Pacific Economic Research , 1-30.
- Karaca, T. (2011, 06 16). Proje yönetiminde çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerini kullanarak kritik yolun bulunması. 23-24. Ankara.
- Klingebiel, D. (2001). The use of asset management companies in the resolution of banking crises cross country experiences. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series.
- Mesutoğlu, B. (2001). Sorunlu aktiflerin varlik yönetimi şirketlerince tasfiyesi- ülke örnekleri-. Ankara: Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu.
- Selimler, H. (2006). Türk bankacilik sektöründe sorunlu kredilerin varlik yönetim şirketlerince tasfiyesi, seçilmiş ülkeler ve Türkiye uygulaması. 298. İstanbul.
- Turan, G. (2015). Çok kriterli karar verme. In B. F. Yıldırım, & E. Önder, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri (p. 15). Bursa : Dora Yayınevi.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Babuşcu, Ş., Hazar, A. (2013). Varlık yönetim şirketlerine satilacak takipteki krediler için değerleme: varsayimsal bir yaklaşım. World of Accounting Science , 153-175.
- Bekar, M. (2014, Kasım). 2008-2013 döneminde Türk bankacilik sektörünün etkinliğinin VZA, Malmquist TFP endeksi ve Multimoora yöntemi ile incelenmesi. 44. Ankara.
- Çelebi, B. (2014, Haziran). Proje tipi bir işletmede 2-tuple Multimoora yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi. Proje Tipi Bir İşletmede 2-Tuple Multimoora Yöntemi ile Tedarikçi Seçimi . Ankara.
- Fung, B., George, J., Hohl, S., Ma, G. (2004). Public asset management companies in East Asia . Bank of International Settlement.
- Hagiwara, A. T., Passadilla, G. (2004). Experience of Asian asset management companies: do they increase moral hazard?- Evidence from Thailand. ERD Working Paper.
- Inogucci, M. (2012). Nonperforming loans and public asset management companies in Malaysia and Thailand. Asia Pacific Economic Research , 1-30.
- Karaca, T. (2011, 06 16). Proje yönetiminde çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerini kullanarak kritik yolun bulunması. 23-24. Ankara.
- Klingebiel, D. (2001). The use of asset management companies in the resolution of banking crises cross country experiences. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series.
- Mesutoğlu, B. (2001). Sorunlu aktiflerin varlik yönetimi şirketlerince tasfiyesi- ülke örnekleri-. Ankara: Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu.
- Selimler, H. (2006). Türk bankacilik sektöründe sorunlu kredilerin varlik yönetim şirketlerince tasfiyesi, seçilmiş ülkeler ve Türkiye uygulaması. 298. İstanbul.
- Turan, G. (2015). Çok kriterli karar verme. In B. F. Yıldırım, & E. Önder, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri (p. 15). Bursa : Dora Yayınevi.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Eylül 2018 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 |
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics
Policy - JBEF applies the standards of
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic
community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications.
Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized
will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors
must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism,
duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The
manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.